My research develops computational models of how molecules organize — from nanoparticles and zeolites to intrinsically disordered proteins and peptide assemblies. The common thread is a reduced model that keeps the essential physics, used to reach collective processes (self-assembly, nucleation, aggregation) that are out of reach for brute-force atomistic simulation, together with methods that connect coarse-grained and atomistic descriptions. My current work uses machine-learning-based probabilistic backmapping to restore atomistic resolution to coarse-grained simulations while preserving thermodynamic consistency.

Generative models for one-to-many CG→AA mappings
Ensemble recovery via statistical-mechanical reweighting
Proteins & assemblies (IDPs, fibrils, condensates)
Mesophases, nucleation, porous materials

Current Focus — University of Arkansas, 2024–present

Schematic: coarse-grained configuration → probabilistic atomistic ensemble → reweighting to recover Boltzmann statistics
CG configuration → probabilistic all-atom generation → reweighting to recover Boltzmann statistics.
Probabilistic CG→AA backmapping with normalizing flows (BoltzMap)
Coarse-grained models make large systems and long timescales accessible by representing groups of atoms with simplified interaction sites, but coarse graining necessarily removes atomistic information. Rather than assigning a single deterministic atomistic configuration to each coarse-grained structure, I develop autoregressive normalizing-flow decoders that sample ensembles of physically plausible atomistic configurations consistent with a given coarse-grained state. Using diphenylalanine (FF) as the model system, the models capture conformational diversity, preserve correlations between internal degrees of freedom, and produce structures that can be used directly in molecular dynamics.
A machine-learned structure is not treated as physically correct simply because it resembles the training set. Generated structures are constrained by molecular geometry and energetics and evaluated with molecular mechanics and statistical-mechanical reweighting, so their statistical weights remain physically interpretable — directly connecting modern generative modeling to the statistical-mechanical framework underlying molecular simulation. Manuscript in preparation: BoltzMap: Probabilistic Backmapping of Coarse-grained Peptides with Normalizing Flows (A. Kumar, S. Paschall, J. Monroe, 2026).
Normalizing flows TensorFlow Probability Reweighting MD refinement Peptide self-assembly
Stabilizing importance weights (effective sample size)
Backmapping is intrinsically a high-variance importance-sampling problem, and naive reweighting suffers from weight collapse. I study stabilization strategies — configurational-bias selection among candidate structures, restrained molecular-dynamics refinement, and careful diagnostics — that raise the effective sample size while keeping thermodynamic observables unbiased.
Importance sampling ESS Uncertainty
Where this is going: protein aggregation across scales
Aberrant protein aggregation underlies several neurodegenerative diseases, and it is a demanding computational problem: aggregation involves slow collective processes that are hard to capture with atomistic molecular dynamics, while the interactions that stabilize particular aggregates often need atomistic resolution to describe. Statistically rigorous transfer of information between coarse-grained and atomistic descriptions lets aggregation-prone conformations, transient intermediates, and sparsely populated states be studied at a combination of scales that neither representation achieves alone. The same methods extend to protein–nucleic-acid assemblies and biomolecular condensates.

Contributions & Impact

The Kumar–Molinero (KM) model: mesophases from isotropic nanoparticles — University of Utah
Demonstrated by molecular simulation that a binary mixture of nanoparticles with simple isotropic interactions can self-assemble into ordered mesophases — lamellar, hexagonal, and double gyroid — previously associated with covalently connected block copolymers ("liquid crystals from spherical particles"). The key design is non-additive, frustrated attraction that sets up competition between mixing and demixing. Follow-up work mapped the full phase diagram, explained why the gyroid is harder to nucleate than lamellar and hexagonal phases, and followed the nucleation pathway from disordered liquid to gyroid.
Key publications: J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2017 (ACS Most Read Physical Chemistry Articles of the Month); J. Phys. Chem. B 2018; J. Chem. Phys. 2019. Independent impact: the interaction model is referred to by other researchers as the Kumar–Molinero model and, since 2018, has been independently used, reproduced, benchmarked, adapted, or extended by at least five research groups in the United States, Argentina, and the Republic of Korea.
Self-assemblyMesophasesGyroidLAMMPS
Mesophase-mediated nucleation and polymorph selection of zeolites — University of Utah
Extending the KM framework with tetrahedral interactions (a network former plus a structure-directing agent) produced a coarse-grained model of zeolite formation in which six distinct zeolite polymorphs crystallize, five of them through metastable mesophase intermediates. These first-author studies showed that mesophases can precede and direct zeolite nucleation, provided a mechanistic framework for polymorph selection in porous materials, and revealed a two-step to one-step transition in zeolite nucleation through a metastable gyroid mesophase. The zeolite work was supported by the ACS Petroleum Research Fund, and its results provided the preliminary data for a subsequent U.S. Department of Energy project on zeolite formation in the Molinero group.
Key publications: J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018; J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2018 (ACS PRF 25th-Anniversary Collection, 2025); J. Phys. Chem. C 2019. Independent impact: the coarse-grained zeolite model was adopted by researchers at Utrecht University as the basis of an inverse-design workflow that reproduced known frameworks (Z1, SGT), optimized others (SOD, CFI), and reported an additional framework, Z5 (ACS Nano 2025).
NucleationPolymorph selectionZeolitesTransition path sampling
Sequence determinants of FUS fibril formation; force fields for disordered proteins — UT Austin
Simulations of the intrinsically disordered protein FUS showed that sequence determines the switch in its fibril-forming regions and variants, revealing distinct fibril-core morphologies, sequence-dependent stability differences, and the impact of phosphorylation on disordered proteins. In parallel, coarse-grained (SOP-IDP) force fields for intrinsically disordered proteins were optimized and their conformational ensembles validated against experimental SAXS profiles, improving the structural characterization of IDPs.
Key publications: J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2021 (first author); Biopolymers 2024; Protein Science 2025.
IDPsFibrilsSAXSPhase separation
Chromatin compaction through protein–DNA condensates — Texas A&M University
Coarse-grained HPS simulations (HOOMD-blue) of HP1–DNA condensates elucidating the thermodynamic stability and diffusion dynamics that underlie chromatin compaction. Presented at the Biophysical Society Annual Meeting (Philadelphia, 2024).
CondensatesChromatinHOOMD-blue

Research Themes

AI & data science for chemistry
Probabilistic generative modeling, coarse-grained-to-atomistic mapping, and physically consistent multiscale simulation.
Proteins & intrinsically disordered systems
Sequence–ensemble relationships, aggregation and fibril formation, biomolecular condensates, and protein–DNA organization.
Self-assembly, nucleation, porous materials
Mesophase self-assembly, polymorph selection, and nucleation pathways in nanoparticle, zeolite, and soft-matter systems.

Methods Toolkit

Machine Learning & Statistics

  • Normalizing flows, variational autoencoders, diffusion models, transformers (TensorFlow / TensorFlow Probability)
  • Probabilistic generative models with calibrated likelihoods; importance reweighting and ESS diagnostics
  • Maximum-likelihood optimization, order-parameter design and analysis

Simulation & Statistical Mechanics

  • Molecular dynamics, Monte Carlo, Brownian dynamics; atomistic and coarse-grained models
  • LAMMPS, GROMACS, AMBER, HOOMD-blue, OpenMM, TOWHEE, Gaussian
  • Classical and non-classical nucleation theory, phase diagrams, free-energy landscapes, transition path sampling
  • Python, Fortran, MATLAB

Selected Outputs

See Publications, Talks & Posters, and the Gallery for details.